2010年12月13日 星期一

音響雜誌的評論公式

前天在百貨街邊走路邊上網,不經意看到 DIYHiFi 上的文章,害我不小心在人群裡失聲狂笑。這是網兄 gmarsh 歸納出來的音響雜誌評論寫作公式,十分中肯:
  • Introducing [product] from [company]
  • Bunch of pictures of [product]
  • Blurb about [company], describing that because they're located at [location] (farm country, near the ocean, whatever) they've obviously got a passion for good audio design or something like that.
  • Blurb about and how [company] put their heart and soul into [product]
  • Description of [pseudo-technology] that [product] introduces
  • Q/A with [company person] who says a bunch of stuff about [pseudo-technology] but doesn't clarify anything
  • A listening test that sounds like someone describing an acid trip. The soundstage was so broad, it first nibbled on my toes, then enveloped me and gave me a hug!
  • Final commentary giving a glowing review.
這麼多年來,看過幾百本音響雜誌,實在不得不承認,幾乎所有的評論都是按照這種公式寫出來的,尤其是充滿 "pseudo technology" ,中外皆然!

全文請見原討論串:Why do I still buy audio mags?

3 則留言:

匿名 提到...

音響雜誌對我的意義或多或少像A書一樣.....(笑)

WF 提到...

把音響雜誌當 A 書?太厲害了!
小弟年老力衰,血氣不足,即使看到器材的裸照,一樣興奮不起來。

swimmy 提到...

音響雜誌像A書,有同感。太過精美(性感??!)的照片,經過悉心設計的誘人描述,都是色情的。

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...